Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of the exemption under the excise notification, the clearances from all factories belonging to the same manufacturer were required to be clubbed for determining the two-crore limit.
Analysis: The notification spoke of the clearances effected by the manufacturer during the preceding financial year. On a plain reading, the relevant consideration was the total output or clearances of the manufacturer, not the clearances of each factory separately. Since the appellant admittedly owned multiple factories and the aggregate clearances from all of them exceeded the prescribed limit, the concession could not be claimed. The subsequent notification relied upon only reinforced the same construction and did not displace the plain language of the earlier notification.
Conclusion: The clearances from all factories were required to be clubbed, and the appellant was not entitled to the exemption.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification grants relief by reference to the clearances of a manufacturer during the preceding financial year, the manufacturer's total clearances from all factories must be aggregated for deciding eligibility unless the notification expressly provides otherwise.