Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods fabricated on job work from materials supplied by customers were assessable on the full value of the finished goods or only on the job work charges, and whether exemption under Notification No. 119/75-C.E. was available.
Analysis: The fabrication process of cutting, shaping, perforating, channeling, ribbing and assembling customer-supplied materials produced distinct finished articles such as tanks and dust catchers. The working of the materials resulted in a new commodity with a separate identity and utility, and the mere characterisation of the activity as job work did not limit valuation to processing charges alone. Since the manufacture yielded new goods from the supplied materials, the assessable value had to include the value of the materials incorporated in the finished products, and the claimed exemption could not be applied to confine duty to labour charges only.
Conclusion: The assessable value was correctly taken on the full value of the manufactured goods, and the assessee was not entitled to restrict duty to job work charges.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on the valuation question because the process amounted to manufacture of new goods from customer-supplied materials.
Ratio Decidendi: Where customer-supplied materials are processed into a new and distinct commodity, excise duty is chargeable on the value of the finished goods and not merely on the job work charges.