Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether godet waste arising in the manufacture of rayon yarn was classifiable under item 18 of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule or under the residuary item 68.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that the earlier Bombay High Court decision in the Century Rayon matter did not finally determine the correct classification of the goods, because that decision quashed the departmental order for want of independent application of mind and did not adjudicate the classification issue on merits. The Tribunal preferred the later Bombay High Court ruling in R.K. Synthetics & Fibres and the connected line of decisions, which treated similar waste as not falling within item 18. The distinction between cellulosic and non-cellulosic waste was held not to alter the classification question. Since the subject godet waste was not covered by item 18 and no specific tariff entry otherwise applied, the residuary entry had to be invoked.
Conclusion: Godet waste was not classifiable under item 18 of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule and was correctly classifiable under item 68; the respondents succeeded on classification.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed, the lower authority's order in favour of the assessee was sustained, and the goods were directed to be reclassified under the residuary tariff item with consequential relief.