Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bubble gum was correctly classifiable under Item No. 1A(1) of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 as chewing gum, or under Item No. 68 of that Schedule.
Analysis: Bubble gum and chewing gum were held to be distinct articles because, although both are chewed and share some ingredients, they differ in essential characteristics, including the ability of bubble gum to be blown into bubbles and the different proportions of ingredients specified for the two products. The fact that both may be treated as confectionery under other laws was considered not decisive, since Item No. 1A covered only specified kinds of confectionery. The use of the expression "chewing gums" in the plural did not justify treating bubble gum as synonymous with chewing gum.
Conclusion: Bubble gum was not classifiable under Item No. 1A(1); it fell under Item No. 68. The finding was in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the lower authorities was set aside and the appellants were held entitled to relief on the basis that bubble gum was assessable under the residuary tariff item.
Ratio Decidendi: A product is not classifiable under a tariff entry for chewing gum merely because it is chewed and shares ingredients; classification must turn on its essential and distinguishing characteristics and on whether it is specifically covered by the relevant entry.