Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether non-automotive gaskets cut out of duty-paid asbestos jointing sheets were classifiable under item 22F(iv) of the Central Excise Tariff or under item 68.
Analysis: The goods in dispute were gaskets made from asbestos sheets that had already been manufactured from asbestos fibre or yarn and had borne duty. Item 22F(iv) was construed as covering manufactures that are the direct result of manufacture from mineral fibre or yarn. The expression did not extend to a further article made out of a manufactured intermediate product. Since the gaskets were manufactured from asbestos sheets and not directly from fibre or yarn, they did not answer the description in item 22F(iv). As non-automotive gaskets were not specified elsewhere in the tariff, the residuary entry applied.
Conclusion: The gaskets were not classifiable under item 22F(iv) and were correctly classifiable under item 68.