Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an improper allowance of rebate of insurance premium can be revoked by resort to section 35 of the Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950.
Analysis: Section 35 authorises reassessment where agricultural income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment or has been assessed at too low a rate. The expression "any reason" is of wide import, and the concept of escapement is not confined to cases where income was omitted from the return. It also extends to cases where, during the assessment process, income was left out of charge because a rebate or allowance was mistakenly granted. A wrongly allowed rebate therefore results in income chargeable to tax escaping assessment within the meaning of section 35.
Conclusion: The question is answered in favour of the revenue. Section 35 can be invoked to revoke an improper allowance of rebate of insurance premium.
Final Conclusion: The reassessment power under section 35 was held applicable to cases where income escaped charge because a rebate was wrongly allowed at the original assessment stage.
Ratio Decidendi: The expression "income escaping assessment" in section 35 is wide enough to include income omitted from charge because a rebate or allowance was erroneously granted during the original assessment.