Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the importer was entitled to concessional assessment under the exemption notifications when the General Manager's certificate was produced after assessment and the end-use requirement was relied upon.
Analysis: Notification No. 35/79-Cus. required, in the case of imports by Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., two distinct certificates: a certificate from the General Manager that the parts were required for the specified purpose and a certificate of end use. The end-use certificate could be furnished after actual use, but the General Manager's certificate had to exist at the time of assessment. The goods had been assessed in June 1979, whereas the General Manager's certificate was dated 21.2.1980. The certificate therefore was not in existence when the assessment was made. The explanation for the delay was not accepted, as the certificate was to be obtained from the appellant's own internal source and no diligent compliance with the notification condition was shown.
Conclusion: The condition precedent for exemption was not satisfied and concessional assessment was not admissible.