TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether intalox saddles, Rasching rings and unglazed balls manufactured for use as tower packings in chemical and allied industries were classifiable as porcelainware under Item 23B(4) of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule.
Analysis: The goods were specialised industrial articles used as tower packings and not as ordinary consumer goods. The relevant entry had to be understood in its popular and commercial sense, not by a purely scientific or dictionary meaning. Applying that test, articles ordinarily bought as porcelainware would not include these specialised industrial items. The appearance and characteristics of the goods, including their dull white colour, rough surface and unglazed nature, also supported the view that they did not answer the commercial description of porcelainware. Even if the goods were made of porcelain, that would not be enough unless they were also understood in trade as porcelainware.
Conclusion: The goods were not classifiable as porcelainware under Item 23B(4) and were not dutiable under that entry.
Final Conclusion: The departmental challenge to the appellate orders failed, and the classification adopted by the lower appellate authority was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: For tariff classification, specialised industrial articles are to be assessed in their commercial parlance sense, and a product is not porcelainware merely because it may be made of porcelain if it is not ordinarily understood or traded as porcelainware.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
