Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purposes of section 23A, a capital loss or non-trading loss carried forward from earlier years could be taken into account in judging the smallness of the profits and the reasonableness of declaring dividend.
Analysis: Section 23A required the Income-tax Officer to consider whether, having regard to losses incurred in earlier years and the smallness of the profits made in the previous year, payment of dividend would be unreasonable. The Court accepted that the expression was not confined to one isolated factor and that all relevant matters bearing on unreasonableness had to be considered. Relying on the approval of the Supreme Court of the view that capital losses, if established, were relevant, the Court held that the assessee's outstanding loss could properly be considered in judging whether dividend declaration was unreasonable.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative, and the finding was in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For the application of section 23A, losses incurred in earlier years include established capital losses, and such losses are relevant in determining whether the payment of dividend would be unreasonable.