Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Income-tax Officer could continue to treat the petitioner as not being in default under the relevant provisions after the appeals before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had been disposed of.
Analysis: The power to grant relief against default under section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, read with its proviso, and section 220(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was available only while the appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was pending. Once that appellate authority disposed of the appeals, the statutory basis for exercising that power came to an end, and the court could no longer direct the Income-tax Officer to treat the petitioner as not in default in respect of the disputed tax. The petitioner's challenge therefore lacked substance.
Conclusion: The request for relief was not sustainable and was decided against the petitioner.