Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether excise duty on goods manufactured before an increase in duty but cleared after the increase is payable at the rate in force on the date of manufacture or on the date of clearance.
Analysis: Rule 9A of the Central Excise Rules fixes the rate of duty with reference to the date of clearance. The distinction drawn in the authorities considered is between goods that were wholly exempt on the date of manufacture and goods that were only partially exempt or otherwise dutiable at that time. Where goods were excisable and liable to duty, even if at a reduced rate, the rate applicable at clearance governs assessment. A contention that the manufacture-date rate alone applies would make Rule 9A ineffective and amount to challenging its validity, which was not accepted.
Conclusion: The duty was payable at the enhanced rate prevailing on the date of clearance, and the assessee's contention was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: For excisable goods that are not wholly exempt at the time of manufacture, the rate of duty applicable under Rule 9A is the rate in force on the date of clearance, not the date of manufacture.