Expenditure-tax turns on true incidence of spending, with house improvement and members' separate expenses excluded from family tax base.

Expenditure-tax liability turned on the true character and incidence of the spending. Installation of an air-conditioning plant in a newly built house was treated as expenditure connected with construction or improvement of immovable property and not as a mere household article, so it fell within the exemption under section 5(e). Amounts debited to a Hindu undivided family account for a Kashmir trip and for members' personal expenses were not includible under section 4(i) where they were in substance borne by individual members from separate funds; lawful apportionment of expenditure to reduce tax was not impermissible.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether expenditure on installation of an air-conditioning plant in a newly built house was exempt under section 5(e) of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957; (ii) Whether expenditure incurred by members of a Hindu undivided family on a Kashmir trip was includible in the family's taxable expenditure under section 4(i) of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957; (iii) Whether expenditure incurred by members of the family for personal purposes such as club expenses, travelling, outfit and watch purchases was includible in the family's taxable expenditure under section 4(i) of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957.

Issue (i): Whether expenditure on installation of an air-conditioning plant in a newly built house was exempt under section 5(e) of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957.

Analysis: The exemption covered expenditure in connection with the construction, repair, maintenance or improvement of immovable property. The plant was fixed to the house, was of durable nature, and could reasonably be regarded as forming part of the immovable property or at least as an improvement to it rather than as a mere household article under the deduction provision.

Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether expenditure incurred by members of a Hindu undivided family on a Kashmir trip was includible in the family's taxable expenditure under section 4(i) of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957.

Analysis: Liability under section 4(i) depended on whether the expenditure was in truth incurred by the assessee. Initial debit in the family account was not conclusive. Where the amounts were later allocated to the individual members and borne out of their separate funds, the expenditure could not be treated as expenditure of the Hindu undivided family. A lawful arrangement to apportion spending so as to reduce tax liability was not impermissible.

Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iii): Whether expenditure incurred by members of the family for personal purposes such as club expenses, travelling, outfit and watch purchases was includible in the family's taxable expenditure under section 4(i) of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957.

Analysis: The matter turned on the same principle under section 4(i), namely whether the expenditure was actually incurred by the assessee. As the amounts were treated as personal expenses of the members and no separate revenue contention was advanced to displace that position, the expenditure was not to be treated as the family's taxable expenditure.

Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The reference succeeded on all the questions referred, and the assessed amounts in dispute were held not liable to be brought into taxable expenditure except as otherwise dealt with by the Tribunal's view accepted by the Court.

Ratio Decidendi: For expenditure-tax purposes, the true character and incidence of expenditure govern liability; expenditure fixed to immovable property may qualify as construction or improvement expenditure, and amounts initially debited to a family account are not taxable as family expenditure if they are in substance borne by individual members from their separate funds.

---