Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Customs Notification No. 389/76-Cus. dated 02.08.1976 was available where imported nylon filament yarn was used in the manufacture of belting ducks as an intermediate product, and the belting for machinery was manufactured by another manufacturer.
Analysis: The notification granted exemption to yarn of man-made fibres imported for the manufacture of belting for machinery, subject to proof to the satisfaction of the Assistant Collector that the imported yarn was so used. The decisive requirement was actual end-use in the manufacture of belting for machinery, and not that the importer himself must personally manufacture the finished belting. Since belting ducks were treated as an essential intermediate product in that manufacturing chain, the benefit could not be denied merely because the final belting was produced by another manufacturer, provided the importer established the ultimate use of the yarn. The importer would remain liable to pay differential duty on any quantity not so accounted for.
Conclusion: The exemption was held applicable in principle to the imported yarn used for belting ducks, subject to proof of its ultimate use in the manufacture of belting for machinery; the appeal was allowed with corresponding relief.