Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported cellulose powder was classifiable for the purpose of additional duty of customs under Heading No. 39.01/06 of the Customs Tariff Schedule and Item No. 15A(1) of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule, or under Item No. 68 of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule.
Analysis: The imported goods were described as highly purified cellulose powder and were not in their natural form. The relevant tariff entry covered, apart from artificial or synthetic resins and plastic materials, other high polymers. Relying on technical literature, the Court held that cellulose is a natural carbohydrate high polymer and that the material imported, being a processed cellulose product, retained that character. The fact that the goods were used for a different purpose and the absence of persuasive proof regarding the classification of a local product under Item 68 did not alter the tariff position. The goods also found support in the classification opinions cited from the CCCN.
Conclusion: The imported cellulose powder was correctly classifiable under Heading No. 39.01/06 of the Customs Tariff Schedule and Item No. 15A(1) of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule, and not under Item No. 68.
Ratio Decidendi: A processed cellulose product that is a high polymer falls within the tariff entries covering other high polymers for the purpose of additional duty of customs.