TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court: Subsidies from RBI not taxable as interest under Interest-tax Act, 1974.</h1> <h3>Punjab National Bank Versus Commissioner of Income-tax</h3> Punjab National Bank Versus Commissioner of Income-tax - [2011] 332 ITR 337 Issues:Whether amounts received as export subsidy from the Reserve Bank of India are chargeable as interest under the Interest-tax Act, 1974 for specific assessment years.Analysis:The case involved a dispute regarding the taxability of amounts received as export subsidy from the Reserve Bank of India under the Interest-tax Act, 1974 for certain assessment years. The Reserve Bank of India had a scheme where nationalized banks provided loans at reduced interest rates to customers, compensated by the Reserve Bank of India through subsidies. The assessee received export subsidies totaling Rs. 23,37,224, Rs. 59,88,360, and Rs. 74,92,486 for the assessment years in question.The Revenue argued that these subsidies were taxable as interest under the Interest-tax Act, 1974. However, the assessee contended that the subsidies were not interest but rather export subsidies. This argument was rejected by the Assessing Officer, Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, which referred to a previous order related to a similar issue.The key question was whether the subsidies received could be considered 'interest' as defined in the Interest-tax Act, 1974. The definition of 'interest' in the Act included interest on loans and advances made in India, which the assessee had not provided to the Reserve Bank of India. Therefore, the subsidies received were not within the scope of the Act's definition of interest.The High Court agreed with the assessee, emphasizing that since no loans or advances were extended to the Reserve Bank of India, the received subsidies were in the nature of export credit subsidy or compensation for lost interest. The Court concluded that the Tribunal had erred in considering the subsidies as interest, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. Consequently, the question was answered in the negative in favor of the assessee, and the references were disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 