Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee educational institution was wholly and substantially financed by the Government so as to qualify for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The institution was found to exist solely for educational purposes and not for profit. The Tribunal relied on the governmental origin and control of the institution, the funding structure reflected in the balance sheet, the manner in which grants and retained revenues were treated, and the audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General as indicators of substantial governmental finance. It also treated earlier years' consistent findings and the nature of the Government's support as supporting the conclusion that financing is to be viewed in a substantive and structural sense, not by a year-to-year comparison of grants against fee income.
Conclusion: The assessee was held to be wholly and substantially financed by the Government and was entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab).
Final Conclusion: The revenue's challenge to the exemption failed, and the institutional income was held exempt under the applicable educational institution provision.
Ratio Decidendi: For exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab), the decisive inquiry is whether the educational institution is in substance financed by the Government, and the presence of fee income or retention of generated revenue does not by itself negate substantial governmental finance.