Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tax Deduction Allowed for Mixed-Use Housing Projects: Commercial Use Must Be Under 10% for Full Benefits.

        Brahma Associates. Versus Joint Commissioner Of Income-tax., Dhareshwar Promoters and Builders, Tushar Developers vs ITO and Kumar Behary Rathi and Raviraj Kothari Punjabi Associates vs DCIT

        Brahma Associates. Versus Joint Commissioner Of Income-tax., Dhareshwar Promoters and Builders, Tushar Developers vs ITO and Kumar Behary Rathi and ... Issues Involved:
        1. Eligibility of deduction under Section 80-IB(10) for housing projects comprising residential housing units and commercial establishments.
        2. Proportionate deduction for residential units if the project includes commercial establishments.
        3. Applicability of the limit prescribed by clause (d) of Section 80-IB(10).

        Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

        1. Eligibility of Deduction under Section 80-IB(10) for Housing Projects Comprising Residential Housing Units and Commercial Establishments:
        The Tribunal considered whether a housing project with both residential and commercial units qualifies for deduction under Section 80-IB(10). It was noted that the term "housing project" is not defined in the Act, leading to divergent views. The Tribunal concluded that the deduction is indeed admissible for such projects, provided the project is approved by the local authority as a housing project or if 90% or more of the total built-up area is used for residential units. The Tribunal emphasized that the primary objective of Section 80-IB(10) is to augment affordable dwelling units, and the presence of commercial units does not vitiate the character of the housing project as long as the residential component predominates.

        2. Proportionate Deduction for Residential Units if the Project Includes Commercial Establishments:
        The Tribunal addressed whether proportionate deduction should be allowed for profits attributable to residential units. It was clarified that Section 80-IB(10) allows deduction for the entire profits of the housing project and not just the portion attributable to residential units. However, if the commercial use exceeds 10% of the total built-up area, the deduction should be confined to the profits from the residential segment of the project, provided the residential segment independently meets the conditions of Section 80-IB(10).

        3. Applicability of the Limit Prescribed by Clause (d) of Section 80-IB(10):
        The Tribunal examined whether the limit on commercial use of built-up area prescribed by clause (d) of Section 80-IB(10) applies retrospectively. It was concluded that this limit is not retrospective and applies only from the assessment year 2005-06 onwards. The Tribunal emphasized that prior to this amendment, there was no explicit statutory limit on commercial use in housing projects, and such a restriction cannot be inferred retrospectively.

        Conclusion:
        The Tribunal held that:
        - Deduction under Section 80-IB(10) is admissible for housing projects with both residential and commercial units if approved by the local authority as a housing project or if 90% or more of the built-up area is for residential units.
        - Deduction applies to the entire profits of the housing project, not just the residential portion, except when commercial use exceeds 10%, in which case it is limited to profits from the residential segment.
        - The limit on commercial use prescribed by clause (d) of Section 80-IB(10) is not retrospective and applies only from the assessment year 2005-06.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found