Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount received by the assessee on retirement from the firm was chargeable as long-term capital gains on the footing that the retirement deed involved a transfer of the assessee's rights in the partnership assets.
Analysis: The amount received on retirement was held to be taxable in capital gains because the retirement deed specifically recorded that the assessee had assigned and relinquished all rights in the firm's assets in favour of the continuing partners for a lump sum consideration. The earlier authorities on retirement and dissolution were examined, but the decisive factor was the mode of retirement. On the facts found, the transaction answered the statutory concept of transfer within the meaning of the capital gains provisions, and the reliance placed on decisions treating a simple valuation-based retirement as a mere realisation of pre-existing rights was held not to govern the present case.
Conclusion: The amount received by the assessee on retirement was correctly assessed as long-term capital gains, and the addition was upheld against the assessee.