Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was entitled to an abatement exceeding Rs. 704 under the agreement for relief from or avoidance of double taxation between India and Ceylon.
Analysis: The question had to be answered by applying article III of the agreement read with the relevant Schedule and section 49A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, under which the agreement was implemented by notification. The income assessed in both countries was Rs. 18,765. Under the Schedule, the relevant percentage for the income was nil, so the whole amount constituted the excess. On that excess, the Ceylon tax was Rs. 704 and the Indian tax was Rs. 1,876.50. Article III required an abatement equal to the lower of the two taxes attributable to the excess, namely Rs. 704.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to any abatement beyond Rs. 704, and the question was answered in the affirmative against the assessee and in favour of the department.