Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum receivable under the deceased's personal accident benefit policy was includible in the principal value of the estate or was required to be treated as a separate estate under section 34(3) of the Estate Duty Act.
Analysis: The deceased had no enforceable right to receive the accident benefit during his lifetime; the amount became receivable only after his death by the nominee or legal heirs. On that footing, the sum could be included in the estate for duty purposes, but it could not be aggregated with the other properties of the deceased for computing the dutiable estate. The governing principle applied was that where the deceased had no lifetime interest in the money payable on death under the policy, the amount is to be assessed as an estate by itself.
Conclusion: The amount of Rs. 60,000 was to be treated as a separate estate and not clubbed with the other assets of the deceased; the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: A sum payable under a personal accident policy, receivable only on the insured's death and in which the deceased had no lifetime interest, is not aggregatable with the other estate and must be assessed separately under section 34(3) of the Estate Duty Act.