Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the excess amount received by the assessee under a consent order, pending final determination of the levy sugar price, constituted taxable income or a trading receipt in the relevant year.
Analysis: The assessee received the disputed difference between the Government-fixed levy price and the higher amount permitted under the interim arrangement, subject to a bank guarantee, interest liability, and eventual refund depending upon the final outcome of the price dispute. The amount was not finally adjudicated as price by the court during the year. It was held that the receipt lacked the character of a determinate and unconditional sale price and was, in substance, only an interim or provisional amount held pending final determination. Since no vested right to retain the excess had accrued during the year, the amount could not be treated as income or trading receipt for that year. The timing of taxation would arise only when the price dispute was finally settled and the amount, if any, became definitively receivable as price.
Conclusion: The excess sum of Rs. 25,27,126 was not taxable as income of the assessee for the year under appeal and was excluded from total income.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded because the disputed excess levy-sugar receipts were held to be provisional amounts pending final price determination and not taxable income for the year.
Ratio Decidendi: A receipt received merely as an interim, refundable amount pending final adjudication of price does not accrue as income or constitute a trading receipt until the right to retain it becomes vested and unconditional.