Investment allowance for civil construction activity upheld where statutory conditions for construction, manufacture, or production were satisfied.

Civil construction activity was treated as capable of qualifying for investment allowance where the statutory conditions for construction, manufacture or production of an article or thing were met. The Tribunal relied on its earlier reasoning and comparable decisions to support inclusion of such activity within Section 32A, while rejecting the Commissioner's narrower view under Section 263. On that basis, the revisionary order was found to be incorrect and the assessee's investment allowance claim was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether a civil construction business was entitled to investment allowance under Section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the Commissioner was justified in revising the assessment under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The assessee carried on civil construction work and claimed investment allowance on the footing that its activity amounted to construction, manufacture, or production of an article or thing within the statutory provision. The Tribunal relied on its earlier view and on comparable decisions to hold that construction activity, on the facts, could fall within the scope of the allowance where the statutory conditions were satisfied. The contrary view taken by the Commissioner was not accepted, and the assessee's claim was treated as covered by the Tribunal's earlier reasoning.

Conclusion: The revisionary order under Section 263 was held to be incorrect, and the assessee was held entitled to succeed on the investment allowance claim.

---