Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1999 (12) TMI 143 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Capital gains on inherited land, year-wise taxability of enhanced compensation interest, and limits on retrospective exemption relief. Inherited Inam lands acquired under the statutory scheme were treated as having no ascertainable cost of acquisition, so compensation on acquisition was ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Capital gains on inherited land, year-wise taxability of enhanced compensation interest, and limits on retrospective exemption relief.

                          Inherited Inam lands acquired under the statutory scheme were treated as having no ascertainable cost of acquisition, so compensation on acquisition was not chargeable to capital gains tax. Interest on enhanced compensation accrued year by year, and only the amount relatable to the year under appeal was taxable in that year. The annual letting value of the self-occupied property was held to require a lower reasonable estimate on the facts. Deduction under section 54E was unavailable because the transfer predated the provision's insertion. Disallowance of agricultural loss was sustained because agricultural income is exempt and such loss is not available for set-off against taxable income.




                          Issues: (i) Whether compensation received on acquisition of Inam lands was chargeable to capital gains tax; (ii) Whether interest on enhanced compensation accrued only in the year of receipt or from year to year; (iii) Whether the annual letting value of the self-occupied property was correctly estimated; (iv) Whether deduction under section 54E was available where the transfer occurred before its insertion; (v) Whether disallowance of agricultural loss was justified.

                          Issue (i): Whether compensation received on acquisition of Inam lands was chargeable to capital gains tax.

                          Analysis: The lands were inherited as Inam lands and the statutory scheme under the Bombay Merged Territories Miscellaneous Alienation and Abolition Act, 1955, only subjected them to land revenue and continued occupancy on payment of assessment. The payment for continuation of occupancy did not amount to the cost of acquisition of ownership. The principle governing capital gains requires an ascertainable cost of acquisition or a legally reckonable substitute. On the facts, the inherited ownership remained uninterrupted and no taxable cost element arose on acquisition.

                          Conclusion: The compensation was not chargeable to capital gains tax, in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (ii): Whether interest on enhanced compensation accrued only in the year of receipt or from year to year.

                          Analysis: Interest on enhanced compensation was governed by the principle that it accrues period-wise and not as a lump sum in the year of actual receipt. Only the amount relatable to the relevant year could be brought to tax in that year, and year-wise segregation was necessary.

                          Conclusion: Only the interest pertaining to the year under appeal was taxable, in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (iii): Whether the annual letting value of the self-occupied property was correctly estimated.

                          Analysis: The assessee's declared figure was found to be too low, but the estimate made by the authorities was considered excessive having regard to the nature of the town, the condition of the property, and comparable indicators. A moderated estimate was therefore warranted on the available facts.

                          Conclusion: The annual letting value was reduced to a lower reasonable figure, partly in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (iv): Whether deduction under section 54E was available where the transfer occurred before its insertion.

                          Analysis: The statutory benefit under section 54E was not on the statute book on the date of transfer. The right to exemption could not be applied retrospectively merely because the compensation was received later. The relevant transfer had to occur when the provision was already in force.

                          Conclusion: Deduction under section 54E was not available, in favour of the Revenue.

                          Issue (v): Whether disallowance of agricultural loss was justified.

                          Analysis: Agricultural income is exempt from tax under the Act, and the corresponding loss from such activity does not become allowable for set-off against taxable income.

                          Conclusion: The disallowance of agricultural loss was sustained, in favour of the Revenue.

                          Final Conclusion: The dispute resulted in mixed relief, with the assessee succeeding on the principal capital gains and interest issues, while the Revenue succeeded on the section 54E issue and the agricultural loss disallowance, and the valuation issue being adjusted to a lower intermediate figure.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Inherited property acquired without an ascertainable cost does not give rise to taxable capital gains on later acquisition, and interest on enhanced compensation accrues year by year; statutory exemption provisions cannot be applied before their insertion into the law.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found