TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Orders Fresh Assessment Due to Inadequate Initial Enquiries, Upholding Section 263 Invocation for Revenue Protection.</h1> <h3>Ambika Agro Suppliers. Versus Income-tax Officer, Ward 2 (6), Jalgaon.</h3> Ambika Agro Suppliers. Versus Income-tax Officer, Ward 2 (6), Jalgaon. - ITD 095, 326, TTJ 100, 405, Issues Involved:1. Invocation of proceedings u/s 263 by the CIT.2. Increase in salary and account writing fee.3. Claim of bad debts.4. Cash payments exceeding Rs. 10,000.5. Verification of unsecured loans from creditors.Summary:1. Invocation of proceedings u/s 263 by the CIT:The CIT, Nashik, invoked proceedings u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, against the assessee for the assessment year 1995-96, claiming the assessment order dated 10-12-1996 was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue. The CIT identified several discrepancies, including a significant increase in salary and account writing fees, unverified bad debts, cash payments exceeding Rs. 10,000, and unsecured loans from creditors without proper enquiry.2. Increase in salary and account writing fee:The CIT observed an abnormal increase in salary expenses (98%) and account writing fees (140%) compared to the previous year, while sales increased by only 58%. The CIT noted that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not make any enquiries into these increases, raising concerns about the genuineness of these expenses and the possibility of inflating expenses to reduce taxable income.3. Claim of bad debts:The CIT found that the AO did not conduct proper enquiries to verify the reality of the bad debts amounting to Rs. 24,949 claimed by the assessee. The assessee argued that the AO had accepted the claim based on the provisions of section 36(2) and the Board Circular No. 551, which allows bad debts to be written off in the year they are deemed irrecoverable.4. Cash payments exceeding Rs. 10,000:The CIT noted that the assessee made cash payments exceeding Rs. 10,000 to Prakash Fertilizer, Malegaon, totaling Rs. 3,86,230. The AO accepted the assessee's claim that these payments were covered u/r 6DD and Board's Circular No. 220 without conducting necessary enquiries to verify the genuineness of the transaction, the identity of the payee, and the circumstances compelling cash payments.5. Verification of unsecured loans from creditors:The CIT observed that the AO did not conduct any enquiry regarding the genuineness of unsecured loans of Rs. 20,000 each from three creditors. The AO accepted the loans as genuine based on account extracts without obtaining confirmatory letters or verifying the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions.Conclusion:The Tribunal upheld the CIT's order, agreeing that the AO's failure to make necessary enquiries rendered the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT's direction to the AO to frame a fresh assessment after proper enquiries and allowing the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
TaxTMI 