Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deduction under section 48(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of long-term capital gains is to be computed on the capital gain determined after excluding the exemption under section 54E, or on the amount arrived at only under section 48(1)(a).
Analysis: The provisions governing capital gains were read together as a scheme. Section 45 was treated as the charging provision subject to the exemptions specified in that section, including section 54E. Section 54E was understood to exclude from tax the portion of long-term capital gain attributable to eligible investment out of net consideration. The expression "capital gain" in section 54E was linked, through the Explanation to section 53, to the amount computed under section 48(1)(a). On a harmonious construction, the amount remaining chargeable after giving effect to section 54E was held to be the figure on which deduction under section 48(2) must be worked out. Acceptance of the assessee's method would have granted deduction even against income not chargeable to tax.
Conclusion: Deduction under section 48(2) had to be computed after excluding the exemption under section 54E, and the assessee's contrary method was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: For computing deduction under section 48(2), the capital gain base must be the amount remaining chargeable after applying the exemption provisions under section 45, including section 54E, and not the gross amount calculated merely under section 48(1)(a).