Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1967 (11) TMI 17 - HC - Wealth-tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        High Court decision on deductibility of special reserve account & shareholders' account in net wealth calculation The High Court ruled against the assessee in a case concerning the deductibility of amounts in the 'special reserve account' and 'shareholders' account' ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            High Court decision on deductibility of special reserve account & shareholders' account in net wealth calculation

                            The High Court ruled against the assessee in a case concerning the deductibility of amounts in the "special reserve account" and "shareholders' account" in determining net wealth. The Court held that the amounts in the "special reserve account" should be included in the net wealth as they were not irrevocably transferred and could be used to set off losses. Additionally, the Court determined that the amounts in the "shareholders' account" should also be included in the net wealth until dividends were declared. Furthermore, the Court disallowed the deduction of debenture liabilities, stating that they were located outside India and therefore should not be deducted in the net wealth computation.




                            Issues Involved:

                            1. Deductibility of amounts in the "special reserve account" in determining the net wealth.
                            2. Deductibility of amounts in the "shareholders' account" in determining the net wealth.
                            3. Deductibility of debenture liabilities as debts owed by the company under section 2(m) read with section 6 of the Wealth-tax Act.

                            Issue-Wise Analysis:

                            1. Deductibility of amounts in the "special reserve account":

                            The Tribunal held that the amounts in the "special reserve account" were not includible in the company's net wealth. The reasoning was that the company was bound to run its undertaking within the rigid framework of an Act of State legislature, which included a provision for setting apart surplus profits for the benefit of the Government. The Tribunal opined that the company held these amounts on Government account and that it would not be proper to include these amounts in the net wealth of the company. However, the High Court disagreed, stating that the money in this account was not irrevocably transferred and could be used to set off losses, thus remaining under the company's control. Consequently, the High Court answered this issue in the negative and against the assessee, indicating that these amounts should be included in the net wealth.

                            2. Deductibility of amounts in the "shareholders' account":

                            The Tribunal affirmed the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's decision to disallow the deduction of amounts in the "shareholders' account." The Tribunal reasoned that the amounts could only be used for declaring dividends to shareholders and did not constitute a debt owed by the company. The High Court agreed, noting that the money in the "shareholders' account" did not become a debt until dividends were declared. Since there was no evidence of declared dividends, the amounts remained part of the company's assets. Therefore, the High Court answered this issue in the negative and against the assessee, confirming that these amounts should be included in the net wealth.

                            3. Deductibility of debenture liabilities:

                            The Tribunal reversed the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's decision to allow the deduction of debenture liabilities. The Tribunal held that the debenture debts were located outside India, as they were owed to creditors in the United Kingdom and secured by a floating charge on the company's assets in India. The High Court agreed, referencing legal principles that specialty debts are situated where the instrument is physically located. Since the debentures were in the United Kingdom, the debts were considered located outside India and thus excluded from the net wealth computation under section 6 of the Wealth-tax Act. The High Court answered this issue in the negative and against the assessee, confirming that these liabilities should not be deducted in determining the net wealth.

                            Conclusion:

                            The High Court's judgment resulted in all three issues being answered in the negative and against the assessee, meaning that the amounts in the "special reserve account" and "shareholders' account" should be included in the net wealth, and the debenture liabilities should not be deducted. The Commissioner was entitled to the costs of the reference.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found