1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal upholds annulment of assessment orders due to lack of material facts disclosure.</h1> The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to annul assessment orders for the mentioned years. It found that the AO failed to establish non-disclosure of ... Full And True Disclosure Issues involved: Department's appeal against CIT(A) order for assessment years 1988-89 and 1989-90.Issue 1: Validity of assessment orders under IT Act- Department raised grounds challenging CIT(A)'s annulment of assessment orders under s. 143(3) r/w s. 147 for the mentioned assessment years.- CIT(A) held that additional income offered by assessee was not considered by AO, questioning the validity of notice issued under s. 148.- CIT(A) erred in ignoring that income had escaped assessment, leading to valid reopening of assessments by AO u/s 147 with Jt. CIT's approval.Issue 2: Background and actions taken- Assessee, engaged in jewellery business and money-lending, faced search and seizure by Police Department.- Assessee's suicide noted during search, with subsequent actions under s. 132/132A of IT Act.- Assessee's widow offered additional income for tax in response to proceedings.Issue 3: Assessment proceedings and challenges- AO accepted returns under s. 143(1) without showing offered income.- CIT set aside assessments under s. 263, later challenged by Department.- AO initiated proceedings under s. 147, leading to annulment by CIT(A) due to jurisdictional issues.Judgment and Legal Analysis:- Tribunal found CIT(A)'s conclusions valid, citing changes in s. 147 post-1989 amendments.- AO's failure to establish non-disclosure of material facts by assessee led to invalid initiation of proceedings under s. 147.- Tribunal emphasized the importance of disclosing material facts for assessment validity.- Case law highlighted the obligation of AO to draw correct inferences from disclosed primary facts.- Lack of precise disclosure failure by assessee rendered s. 147 proceedings invalid.- Tribunal quashed assessment orders for both assessment years, dismissing Department's appeals.