Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether amounts written off as debts arising from speculative business transactions prohibited by law were allowable as deductions as bad and doubtful debts under section 10(1) or section 10(2)(xi) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The debts had arisen in the course of business and had been brought into account on mercantile principles on accrual. The mere fact that the transactions were unlawful and the resulting claims were unenforceable in a court of law did not, by itself, negative the existence of business debts or their character as deductible trading debts. The governing requirement was not legal enforceability alone, but proof that the debts were in fact irrecoverable. The assessee had written off the amounts, the Income-tax Officer had sought confirmation from the debtors, and the debtors' non-response, along with the surrounding circumstances, supported the inference that the amounts had become unrealised and unrecoverable.
Conclusion: The amounts were allowable as bad debts, and the question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A business debt incurred on mercantile account may be allowed as a bad debt when it is shown to have become irrecoverable, and its mere unenforceability in law does not prevent deduction if irrecoverability is otherwise established.