Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the right to collect toll under a build-operate-transfer arrangement constituted an intangible asset, namely a licence or other business or commercial right of similar nature, eligible for depreciation under section 32(1)(ii).
Analysis: The right to collect toll arose from the infrastructure project arrangement and was an independent commercial right connected with the assessee's business. Section 32(1)(ii) extends depreciation to licences, franchises, and other business or commercial rights of similar nature, and the statutory amendment was intended to widen the scope of depreciation to such intangible assets. Applying the interpretative principles of ejusdem generis and noscitur a sociis, the right to collect toll was held to fall within the same class as the specified intangible assets. The fact that the right was for a limited period did not alter its character as an intangible asset.
Conclusion: The toll collection right was an intangible asset within section 32(1)(ii) and depreciation was allowable in favour of the assessee.