Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the exemption notification issued under the Cochin Income-tax Act continued to operate after subsequent legislative changes so as to protect the V.T.K. Estate from agricultural income-tax for the assessment year 1962-63.
Analysis: The notification exempted members of the Cochin Ruling Family from tax in respect of all incomes except specified categories. It was issued under the earlier Cochin Income-tax Act and, by reason of the general clauses provision governing repeal and re-enactment, continued in force under the later Cochin Income-tax Act. The later legislative changes, including the introduction of agricultural income-tax and the eventual repeal of the Cochin income-tax legislation in relation to agricultural income, did not expressly withdraw the exemption. The exemption was treated as delimiting the taxable field itself, and as covering later-imposed taxes within that field unless clearly taken away by subsequent legislation.
Conclusion: The exemption remained operative and extended to agricultural income-tax. The V.T.K. Estate was not assessable to agricultural income-tax for the assessment year 1962-63, and the assessment notice and order were liable to be quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory exemption expressed in wide terms continues to protect the exempted class against later taxes falling within its scope, unless the exemption is expressly or necessarily withdrawn by subsequent legislation.