Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest paid by the firm on a loan advanced by an individual partner in his personal capacity, while he was a partner only in a representative capacity, was disallowable under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Explanation 2 inserted in section 40(b) by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984 was treated as an explanatory provision and hence applicable retrospectively to the assessment year in appeal. On that basis, interest paid by the firm to the individual otherwise than as partner in a representative capacity could not be brought within the disallowance contemplated by section 40(b). The factual position was that the interest related to a personal loan advanced by the partner and was not interest on a transaction falling within the representative capacity in which he was admitted to the firm.
Conclusion: The disallowance under section 40(b) was not sustainable and the interest amount could not be added to the income of the firm.