Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment made under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was vitiated for non-compliance with section 142(3) because the assessee was not furnished the details of comparable cases relied upon for estimating gross profit.
Analysis: Section 142(3) gives statutory recognition to the rule of natural justice that an assessee must be given an opportunity of being heard in respect of material gathered through enquiry under section 142(2) and proposed to be used in assessment. Where the Income-tax Officer relied on gross profits disclosed by allegedly comparable cases to estimate the assessee's gross profit, the details of those cases constituted material relevant to the assessment. Since no particulars of the comparable cases were supplied, the assessee was deprived of the opportunity contemplated by the statute.
Conclusion: The assessment was vitiated for breach of section 142(3), and the question was answered in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the department.