Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount of proposed dividend declared before the appointed day but not paid because of the Companies (Temporary Restrictions on Dividends) Act, 1974 was deductible from the general reserve while computing the assessee-company's capital for surtax purposes.
Analysis: A dividend declared by a company in general meeting created an enforceable liability to shareholders under the Companies Act, 1956. The temporary restriction introduced by section 5 of the Companies (Temporary Restrictions on Dividends) Act, 1974 only suspended payment beyond the permitted limit and did not extinguish the liability already created by the declaration. Since the amount was declared to be paid out of general reserve and represented an existing liability, it had the character of a provision against that liability and had to be deducted from the general reserve for determining capital.
Conclusion: The deduction of the unpaid dividend amount from the general reserve was justified and the contention of the assessee failed.
Final Conclusion: The disputed dividend liability was rightly taken into account in reducing general reserve for surtax capital computation, and the assessee obtained no relief.
Ratio Decidendi: A dividend declared before a temporary statutory restriction on payment remains an existing liability, and where it is chargeable against general reserve it must be deducted in computing capital for surtax purposes.