Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether a federal co-operative society supplying milk through member societies was entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether milk could be treated as agricultural produce so as to bring the assessee within section 80P(2)(a)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Issue (i): Whether a federal co-operative society supplying milk through member societies was entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The provision grants exemption only to a co-operative society that is a primary society engaged in supplying milk raised by its members to a federal milk co-operative society. The assessee was found to be a federation of primary societies, not a primary society itself, and it purchased milk from member societies before reselling it. The statutory condition of being a primary society was therefore not met.
Conclusion: The claim under section 80P(2)(b) was not available to the assessee and was rightly rejected.
Issue (ii): Whether milk could be treated as agricultural produce so as to bring the assessee within section 80P(2)(a)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The term agricultural produce was construed in the context of the Act and the concept of agricultural income under section 2(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On that basis, milk was held not to fall within agricultural produce. The separate exemption for primary milk societies in section 80P(2)(b) also indicated that milk was not intended to be covered by section 80P(2)(a)(iii). In any event, the produce in question was that of the members of the primary societies, not the members of the assessee-federation itself.
Conclusion: Milk was not agricultural produce for the purpose of section 80P(2)(a)(iii), and the assessee was not entitled to deduction under that provision.
Final Conclusion: The assessee failed on both grounds, and the disallowance of exemption was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Deduction under section 80P(2)(b) is confined to a primary society supplying milk raised by its own members to a federal milk co-operative society, and section 80P(2)(a)(iii) does not extend to milk as agricultural produce or to produce of members of member societies.