Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether remuneration paid to director-shareholders who rendered no substantial service to the company was allowable as business expenditure under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, in view of section 10(4A) of the same Act.
Analysis: The company's two director-shareholders resided away from the place of business, had no business background justifying the remuneration, and did no work for the company beyond attending some meetings. The allowance accepted by the Tribunal rested only on the view that they had financed the enterprise, but section 10(2)(xv) permits only expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business, not a return on investment. The facts showed that the payment was not warranted by business consideration and operated as a device to distribute expected profits to the director-shareholders.
Conclusion: The remuneration of Rs. 500 per month each was not an allowable business expenditure and the answer was against the assessee-company.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment to director-shareholders is deductible only if it is genuine business expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes; a payment made as a return on investment or as a device to distribute profits is not allowable.