Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable for belated filing of returns for the assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72.
Analysis: The returns were filed after a substantial delay following notice under section 148. The explanation accepted was that the assessee, having retired from service, had to depend on his former office for particulars of leave salary and for tracing the income-tax file misplaced by the accountant, and that there was no material to show wanton disregard of the statutory obligation. The delay was therefore not treated as a case of conscious neglect or deliberate default, and the explanation was held to constitute reasonable cause in the circumstances.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 271(1)(a) was not justified and was cancelled.