1976 (12) TMI 94 - AT - Wealth-tax

Mortgage advances not exempt under Wealth-tax Act; interest added to wealth

The Tribunal held that advances made in mortgages by the assessee were not exempt under section 2(e)(v) of the Wealth-tax Act. It clarified that mortgages ... - Issues:- Interpretation of exemption under section 2(e)(v) of the Wealth-tax Act for advances made in mortgages- Inclusion of accrued interest on mortgage loans in the wealth of the assesseeAnalysis:1. The appeals and cross-objections before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT MADRAS-C involved the interpretation of the exemption under section 2(e)(v) of the Wealth-tax Act for advances made in mortgages by the assessee for assessment years 1969-70 to 1974-75. The dispute centered around whether the amounts advanced on mortgage and others should be excluded under this provision.2. The Wealth-tax Officer rejected the assessee's claim for exemption under section 2(e)(v) on the grounds that the advances were akin to loans and therefore considered movable assets. Additionally, accrued interest on the advances was estimated and added to the assessments for the relevant years.3. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner, in a consolidated order, upheld the assessee's claim that the interest in properties under mortgage for a period not exceeding six years should be excluded from the total wealth. However, the accrued interest on mortgage loans was upheld as additions to the wealth by the AAC.4. The Revenue contended that the AAC erred in interpreting section 2(e)(v) by arguing that the provision did not apply to mortgages, which they considered as loans secured by property. On the other hand, the assessee relied on legal commentary to support the exclusion of both principal and interest on mortgage loans under the exemption provision.5. The Tribunal analyzed the provisions of section 2(e)(v) of the Wealth-tax Act, emphasizing that short-term estates should be excluded from an assessee's assets. It clarified that mortgages, despite involving a transfer of interest in property, were essentially loans secured by property and did not fall under the exemption provision. The Tribunal dismissed the reliance on foreign legal commentary and held that the provision did not apply to mortgages where the interest could still be available to the assessee after six years.6. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the relief granted by the AAC regarding the inclusion of the principal amount of loans advanced on mortgages in the assessee's wealth. It directed the inclusion of interests on such loans in the assessee's wealth. As a result, the appeals of the Revenue were allowed, and the cross-objections of the assessee were dismissed.