Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act was to be recomputed with reference to the rate in force on the date of default or the later amended rate.
Analysis: The penalty provision was held to be governed by the law in force on the date when the default was committed. The provision under the Wealth-tax Act was treated as analogous to the corresponding provision considered under the Gift-tax Act, and the amendment enhancing the rate, which came into force later, was held inapplicable to defaults already completed before that date. The mere pendency of a special leave petition against the supporting High Court decision did not displace its operation while it continued to hold the field.
Conclusion: The penalty had to be recomputed with reference to the rate applicable on the date of default, and the assessee succeeded on this issue.