Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the expenditure incurred in defending criminal proceedings against the assessee-company and its officers was deductible in computing business profits under the income-tax law.
Analysis: The deductibility of legal expenses depends on the nature and purpose of the proceedings in relation to the assessee's business, not on the eventual result of the prosecution. Here, the prosecution arose from allegations affecting the quality and standard of the assessee's manufactured goods, and the defence was directed to protecting the quality of the product and the goodwill of the business. The expenditure was therefore incurred in the course of defending a matter intimately connected with the business operations of the assessee.
Conclusion: The expenditure was allowable as a deduction and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Legal expenses incurred in criminal proceedings are deductible where the proceedings arise out of and are connected with the assessee's business, and their allowability depends on the nature and purpose of the proceedings rather than the final outcome.