1983 (7) TMI 115 - AT - Wealth-tax

Tribunal Upholds Authority for Fresh Assessment under Wealth-tax Act despite Absence of Specific Provision

Padmini Chandrasekaran. Versus Wealth-Tax Officer/Income-Tax Officer And Another.

The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s authority to direct a fresh assessment under the Wealth-tax Act, despite the absence of a specific ... Assessment Order Issues:1. Jurisdiction of Commissioner (Appeals) to direct fresh assessment under Wealth-tax Act.2. Interpretation of provisions under Wealth-tax Act regarding fresh assessment.3. Powers of Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) in disposing of an appeal.Jurisdiction of Commissioner (Appeals) to direct fresh assessment under Wealth-tax Act:The case involved an appeal by the assessee against a wealth-tax assessment for the year 1976-77 conducted under section 16(5) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The Commissioner of Wealth-tax (Appeals) set aside the assessment due to the absence of a notice served on the assessee and directed a fresh assessment to be made. The assessee challenged the Commissioner's authority to issue such a direction. The Tribunal noted that while the Income-tax Act specifically empowers the Income Tax Officer to proceed with a fresh assessment, a similar provision exists in the Wealth-tax Act. The Tribunal held that the absence of a provision explicitly worded like section 146 of the Income-tax Act does not negate the authority of the Commissioner (Appeals) to direct a fresh assessment under the Wealth-tax Act.Interpretation of provisions under Wealth-tax Act regarding fresh assessment:The assessee argued that the direction for a fresh assessment would extend the time limit indefinitely, contrary to the provisions of the Act. However, the Tribunal pointed out section 17A(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, which allows for a fresh assessment within four years from the end of the financial year in which the order setting aside or cancelling an assessment is received by the Commissioner. The Tribunal clarified that the time limit for a fresh assessment is not extended by the appellate order but is governed by the statute itself. Even if the Commissioner (Appeals) had not directed a fresh assessment, the Wealth Tax Officer would still have the authority to conduct one after the original assessment is set aside or cancelled by the appellate authority.Powers of Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) in disposing of an appeal:The Tribunal highlighted the wide amplitude of powers vested in the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) under section 23(5) of the Wealth-tax Act. The AAC has the authority to pass any order he deems fit, including directing a fresh assessment when cancelling or setting aside the assessment under appeal. Considering the broad powers granted under section 23 and the specific provision in section 17A(3) regarding the time limit for a fresh assessment, the Tribunal concluded that the direction issued by the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh assessment was within the scope of his authority. As a result, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee.