TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Stock exchange membership not an asset under Wealth Tax Act, Tribunal rules</h1> <h3>Deputy Commissioner Of Income-tax. Versus Govindlal M. Parikh.</h3> The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) that membership of a stock exchange does not constitute an asset under the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The ... - Issues:Whether membership of a stock exchange constitutes an asset for the purpose of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957.Analysis:The case involved three appeals by the Department concerning the issue of whether membership of a stock exchange would be considered an asset held by the assessee for the Wealth Tax Act. The CIT(A) argued that the membership did not confer any property that could be transferred to the assessee. The articles of association of the Madras Stock Exchange Ltd. were examined, revealing that membership was limited to 400 individuals, with admission based on eligibility criteria. The membership was described as a personal permission from the exchange to exercise attached rights and privileges, subject to exchange regulations. Importantly, members were prohibited from assigning or transferring their membership rights. The Tribunal noted that membership did not create an enduring asset, as it was merely a permission to use certain rights and privileges without any transferable asset being acquired. The Tribunal distinguished a previous case where transferable rights were involved, which was not applicable in the current scenario. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeals for all assessment years.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
