TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT allows appeal for investment allowance on ginning factory, ruling ginning qualifies as manufacturing.</h1> <h3>R. NARAYANASWAMI NAICKER & SONS. Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER.</h3> The ITAT allowed the appeal against the CIT's withdrawal of investment allowance for a ginning factory, holding that ginning qualifies as manufacturing ... - The appeal was against the CIT's withdrawal of investment allowance under s. 32A. The assessee, a ginning factory, claimed investment allowance for machinery. The CIT withdrew the allowance, stating ginning was not manufacturing. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, stating ginning transforms raw cotton into a distinct product, qualifying as manufacturing. The appeal was allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
