TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal confirms tea estate income as agricultural, rejects revenue's challenge.</h1> <h3>INCOME TAX OFFICER. Versus (SMT). KEMPADEVAMMA.</h3> The tribunal upheld the AAC's decision to grant relief by taxing only 40% of the lease income from a tea estate, confirming that the income qualifies as ... - The appeal relates to the exemption claim of income from leasing a tea estate. The ITO rejected the claim, but the AAC granted relief by taxing only 40% of the lease income. The revenue appealed, arguing the income was not primarily from agricultural land. The tribunal confirmed the AAC's decision, stating the lease income falls under the definition of agricultural income. The appeal was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
