Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether chit kasar paid by a firm to its partners, in their capacity as subscribers to the chits, was disallowable under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The payments were found to have been made to the partners not as partners but as subscribers participating in the chit scheme. The amount paid was characterised as a rebate for contributing to the chit and not as interest, remuneration, salary or commission paid to a partner within the mischief of section 40(b). The reasoning was supported by the view that a payment received in a different capacity does not attract the statutory bar merely because the recipient is also a partner.
Conclusion: Section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was held inapplicable, and the addition of the chit kasar amount was deleted in favour of the assessee.