Settlement without delivery treated as speculative loss for tax purposes, despite being labelled damages for breach of contract.

A contract for sale of castor oil settled without actual delivery, where the assessee paid the rate difference as damages after failing to deliver, was treated as a speculative transaction for income-tax purposes. The fact that the payment was described as damages for breach of contract did not change its tax character because the contract was not performed by delivery and settlement occurred after the delivery time had expired. The isolated nature of the contract and completion of other contracts did not alter the position for this transaction. The resulting loss was therefore characterised as a speculative loss and not an allowable business expenditure.

---

---

Issues: Whether the amount paid by the assessee as damages for breach of contract on non-delivery of castor oil constituted an allowable business expenditure or a speculative loss under the income-tax law.

Analysis: The assessee had entered into a contract for sale of castor oil but failed to effect delivery and later settled the claim by paying the difference in rate as damages. The governing principle applied was that, for income-tax purposes, a transaction settled otherwise than by actual delivery falls within the scope of a speculative transaction under the statutory definition, and the payment made on such settlement is to be treated according to that character. The fact that the amount was described as damages for breach of contract did not alter the tax character of the loss where there was no actual delivery and the settlement occurred after the delivery time had expired. The contention that the transaction was isolated or that other contracts had been completed did not change the nature of the particular contract in question.

Conclusion: The amount was held to be a speculative loss and not an allowable business expenditure; the assessee's claim failed.

Final Conclusion: The tax authority's view was restored, and the Revenue succeeded on the footing that the loss arising from settlement without delivery was speculative in character.

Ratio Decidendi: A contract settled otherwise than by actual delivery, where the commodity is not delivered and the claim is adjusted by payment of differences or damages, is a speculative transaction for income-tax purposes and the resulting loss is a speculative loss.

---