Discarded capital asset sales taxable, but hydraulic broaching machine not classed as electrical goods for special rate

Sale of discarded capital machinery after years of use was treated as taxable turnover because transactions incidental and ancillary to trade can be brought to assessment even when the asset is no longer in active use. However, the machinery was not classified as electrical goods under item 41 merely because it used electric motors for motive power; on its intrinsic character and common parlance meaning, it was a hydraulic broaching machine, so the special 9% rate did not apply. The general multi-point rate was therefore accepted, giving the assessee partial relief.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the sale of discarded broaching machinery, being a capital asset sold after use, was liable to be included in taxable turnover as a transaction in the course of business; and (ii) whether the machinery could be treated as electrical goods liable to assessment at 9 per cent under item 41 of the First Schedule.

Issue (i): whether the sale of discarded broaching machinery, being a capital asset sold after use, was liable to be included in taxable turnover as a transaction in the course of business

Analysis: The turnover arose from the disposal of a broaching machine that had been purchased as capital equipment and sold after years of use. The governing principle applied was that transactions incidental and ancillary to trade can fall within taxable turnover. Sales of discarded capital assets were treated as assessable on that footing, and the mere fact that the asset was no longer in active use did not exclude the transaction from assessment.

Conclusion: The sale of the discarded machinery was held taxable and includible in the assessable turnover.

Issue (ii): whether the machinery could be treated as electrical goods liable to assessment at 9 per cent under item 41 of the First Schedule

Analysis: The machinery was found, on its description and brochure, to be essentially a hydraulic broaching machine, with electric motors serving only as motive power. Applying the established test that an article must be intrinsically electrical goods and be understood as such in common parlance, the machine did not answer the description of electrical goods merely because it used electric power for operation. The Tribunal therefore rejected the classification adopted by the lower authorities under item 41 and accepted assessment at the general multi-point rate under section 3(1).

Conclusion: The machinery was not electrical goods and could not be assessed at 9 per cent under item 41 of the First Schedule.

Final Conclusion: The turnover from the discarded machine remained taxable, but the special classification as electrical goods was set aside, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: A machine is not "electrical goods" merely because it is operated with or fitted with electric motors; its intrinsic nature and common parlance understanding must make it electrical goods before entry-based assessment can apply.

---