Common and commercial parlance governs goods classification; binocular microscopes and reading telescopes fell within the relevant sales tax entry.

Revision of assessment was upheld because the turnover had been assessed at a rate lower than the rate properly applicable, satisfying the statutory condition for revision under section 16(1)(b). Binocular microscopes and reading telescopes were also treated as falling within entry 8 of the First Schedule, since classification of goods depends on common and commercial parlance, aided where appropriate by technical and dictionary meanings. On that basis, "binoculars" was held to include binocular instruments used with both eyes, and "telescopes" to include reading telescopes. The assessment was therefore left undisturbed and the Revenue succeeded on both issues.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the revision of assessment under section 16(1)(b) was competent on the footing that the turnover had been assessed at a rate lower than the rate at which it was assessable. (ii) Whether binocular microscopes and reading telescopes were covered by entry 8 of the First Schedule as binoculars, telescopes or opera glasses.

Issue (i): Whether the revision of assessment under section 16(1)(b) was competent on the footing that the turnover had been assessed at a rate lower than the rate at which it was assessable.

Analysis: The turnover had initially been subjected to multi-point tax, while the revising authority treated the goods as falling under the first-sale levy applicable to entry 8 of the First Schedule. Once the lower rate assessment was found inconsistent with the proper classification, the statutory condition for revision was satisfied.

Conclusion: The revision of assessment was valid and this issue was decided in favour of the Revenue.

Issue (ii): Whether binocular microscopes and reading telescopes were covered by entry 8 of the First Schedule as binoculars, telescopes or opera glasses.

Analysis: The decision turned on the nature of the instruments as understood in common and commercial parlance, supported by dictionary and encyclopaedic meanings, scientific usage and the departmental clarification. The expression "binoculars" was held to comprehend binocular instruments viewed with both eyes, including binocular microscopes; "telescopes" was held to include reading telescopes; and the overlap with opera glasses reinforced the breadth of entry 8. The goods in dispute were therefore treated as falling within the relevant entry.

Conclusion: Binocular microscopes and reading telescopes were held to fall within entry 8, and this issue was decided in favour of the Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed because both the jurisdiction to revise and the classification adopted by the lower authorities were upheld, leaving the assessment undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: In classifying goods for sales tax entry purposes, the meaning of the entry is determined by common and commercial parlance, supported by technical usage where relevant; instruments using both eyes for vision may fall within "binoculars" when that is the ordinary and accepted commercial understanding of the term.

---