Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance under section 40(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was justified in respect of the assessee's claim under section 35AB for technical know-how fees on the ground that tax was not deducted at source.
Analysis: The claim under section 35AB was otherwise undisputed, but the Revenue invoked section 40(a) on the premise that the amount represented fees for technical services chargeable to tax and payable outside India without deduction of tax under Chapter XVII-B. The relevant provisions were considered with reference to the scope of total income under sections 4 and 5 and the deeming provision in section 9(1)(vii). On the contractual terms and the payment mechanism, the fees were held to have accrued under the agreement with the technical contractor, but the actual settlement was routed through the Government of India and the Crown Agents under the project funding arrangement. On those facts, the amount was held not to have been payable by the assessee to the foreign contractor outside India in the manner contemplated by section 40(a).
Conclusion: The disallowance under section 40(a) was not sustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the deduction claimed under section 35AB.
Ratio Decidendi: Where technical know-how fees are contractually due but, on the actual payment structure and surrounding arrangement, are not payable outside India by the assessee in the manner contemplated by section 40(a), disallowance for failure to deduct tax at source is not attracted.