1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, rejects unexplained capital addition, directs AO to accept declared income</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, ruling that the addition of unexplained capital to the declared income was not valid as the ... Opening Capital Issues:Confirmation of addition of unexplained capital in the assessment for the year.Analysis:The appeal was against the confirmation of an addition of Rs. 40,152 as unexplained capital belonging to the assessee for the assessment year 1991-92. The assessee's representative argued that the capital amount was explained and should not be treated as unexplained. The Dy. CIT(A) confirmed the AO's action, considering it a case of bogus capital formation. The representative contended that the AO's estimation of income was incorrect and that the opening capital had been accepted in the previous year's assessment, thus could not be added in the current year. The Departmental Representative supported the lower authorities' decision, claiming the income was unlikely for a lady from such a family background. The Tribunal carefully reviewed the case, noting that the assessee had confirmed her work activities and ownership of fixed deposits. The AO's estimation of income was based on the lady's statement, and the return for the previous year had been accepted without any reopening. The Tribunal concluded that the addition to the declared income was not valid, as the opening capital was verifiable and the AO could not make additions without disturbing the previous year's final assessment. Consequently, the addition was deleted, and the AO was directed to accept the declared income. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.