Appellate tribunal remand power is limited to issues in appeal and cannot reopen unchallenged additions.

An appellate tribunal's power of remand is confined to the subject-matter actually in appeal and cannot be used to reopen unchallenged additions or indirectly enlarge the assessment. The text states that the first appellate authority may have wider powers, but the tribunal cannot set aside the entire appellate order or direct fresh consideration of matters not properly before it, including a confirmed unexplained stock addition treated only as supporting material. The remand and any direction enabling enhancement beyond the assessment made by the original authority were therefore beyond jurisdiction, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Appellate Tribunal had jurisdiction to set aside the entire order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and direct fresh disposal of the appeal by reopening the addition for unexplained stock, and by treating cash credits and bank deposits as an independent basis for addition.

Analysis: The appellate power of the Tribunal is confined to making such orders as it thinks fit on the appeal, and that power is limited to the subject-matter actually carried in appeal. The first appellate authority has wider powers, including enhancement, but the Tribunal does not possess a corresponding power to enlarge the assessment indirectly through remand. The power of remand is ancillary and must remain within the bounds of the appellate jurisdiction; it cannot be used to reopen matters not in contest or to contemplate enhancement beyond the assessment made by the original authority. The unexplained stock addition of Rs. 20,000 had not been challenged by the assessee and was not the subject of the department's appeal, while the cash credits and bank deposit had been treated only as supporting circumstances and not as separate heads of income.

Conclusion: The Tribunal had no jurisdiction to set aside the entire order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. It could deal only with the additions of Rs. 16,845 and Rs. 27,563, and it could not reopen the confirmed addition of Rs. 20,000 or direct fresh consideration of unaccounted stock as an independent issue. A direction treating cash credits and bank deposits as a separate basis for addition, or permitting enhancement beyond the assessment made by the Income-tax Officer, was beyond jurisdiction.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee, with the Tribunal's remand held to have exceeded the limits of its appellate authority.

Ratio Decidendi: An appellate authority can remand only within the confines of the appeal before it, and cannot use remand to reopen unchallenged issues or to effect enhancement beyond the powers expressly conferred by statute.

---